Renames the subscription to gitea-pr-comments (it handles one event; the old
gitea-events name promised more than it delivered) and drops --deliver.
Rather than move the hardcoded route from one constant to another, the relay
now reads it from the request path: POST /gitea/<route> forwards to
<base>/webhooks/<route>. The route name was the last thing tying this service
to a specific subscription, so a second Hermes route is now a `hermes webhook
subscribe <name>` plus a Gitea hook at /gitea/<name>, with no relay change --
previously it would also have needed a second relay URL baked in here.
The path segment is interpolated into an outbound URL, so it is validated
against ^[A-Za-z0-9][A-Za-z0-9._-]{0,63}$ and refused rather than sanitised
when it does not match. The path is matched raw and never URL-decoded, so
percent-encoded separators fail the charset check instead of surviving it;
requiring an alphanumeric first character also rejects "." and "..". Without
this, POST /gitea/..%2fadmin would let anything that can reach the relay
steer it at other Hermes endpoints. Tests cover traversal, encoded traversal,
embedded slashes, leading dot/dash, and the length bound, and assert nothing
reaches the stub Hermes in any of those cases.
Dropping --deliver leaves it at its default of `log`. The prompt tells her to
answer in the pull request, so the PR comment is the delivery and a Telegram
copy would only duplicate it; this also removes the hardcoded chat id that
was a third copy of TELEGRAM_HOME_CHANNEL.
Provisioning retires the pre-rename hook by its EXACT old URL rather than by
"points at the relay". Now that sibling hooks for other routes are the
intended pattern, a prefix match would delete them.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S94o42aQ8VkBmEWvDem5xa
The relay was forwarding X-Gitea-Event and re-signing the body into the
deprecated generic-V1 X-Webhook-Signature header. Neither is something
Hermes acts on, which left the PR's core premise — "Hermes owns event
selection" — impossible to reach:
- Hermes reads the event name only from X-GitHub-Event/X-GitLab-Event,
then payload event_type/type, then falls back to the literal string
"unknown" (gateway/platforms/webhook.py). Gitea sends X-Gitea-Event and
no such payload key, so every delivery arrived as "unknown" and
`hermes webhook subscribe --events ...` could never select anything.
- Gitea's addDefaultHeaders() already signs every webhook type with
X-Hub-Signature-256 in GitHub's exact format, and Hermes accepts that
header on any route with no per-route provider gating. Re-signing into
V1 was both redundant and on a deprecated path.
So the relay now verifies the signature (accepting either X-Hub-Signature-256
or X-Gitea-Signature), forwards body and signature byte-for-byte, and copies
the one header Hermes actually needs. Authentication alone never justified
this service; that header copy does, and the module comment now says so.
Also fixed:
- gitea-hermes-webhook-provision had no API readiness wait, unlike both
sibling units in the same file. After=gitea.service does not mean gitea
is serving HTTP, so under `set -e` a Type=oneshot with no Restart= would
fail on first boot and stay failed, leaving the webhook unregistered.
- podman-hermes-agent added to the secret's restartUnits. The secret
reaches the container only via sops.templates, whose rendered path never
changes, so systemd would not restart the container when the secret was
first added — hermes-agent-webhook-route then read an empty value back
out of it and subscribed with an empty secret.
- Webhook provisioning passes the request body to curl on stdin rather
than in argv, keeping the shared secret out of /proc/<pid>/cmdline.
- Missing Content-Length now returns 411 rather than 413; dropped the
unreachable non-2xx branch (urlopen raises on non-2xx); env-var secret
fallback is stripped to match the credential-file path.
Adds gitea-hermes-webhook-relay-test.py, which drives the real relay over
real HTTP against a stub Hermes and covers the header copy as a regression
test. Both nixosConfigurations still evaluate.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S94o42aQ8VkBmEWvDem5xa
darmanandClaude Opus 5